[134842] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Mitchell)
Wed Jan 12 12:02:18 2011
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP171FA5EE6F76A7B0191101BBBF10@phx.gbl>
From: Jay Mitchell <jay@miscreant.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 03:57:40 +1100
To: Tarig Ahmed <tariq198487@hotmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Tell your security guy he should be looking for another job.
On 21/03/2007, at 8:41 PM, Tarig Ahmed <tariq198487@hotmail.com> wrote:
> We have wide range of Public IP addresses, I tried to assign public ip dir=
ectly to a server behined firewall( in DMZ), but I have been resisted.
> Security guy told me is not correct to assign public ip to a server, it sh=
ould have private ip for security reasons.
>=20
> Is it true that NAT can provide more security?
>=20
> Thanks,
>=20
> Tarig Yassin Ahmed
>=20
>=20
