[134789] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Jan 10 21:54:14 2011

To: lorddoskias <lorddoskias@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Jan 2011 01:17:39 GMT."
	<4D2BAFB3.5020602@gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:52:51 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

--==_Exmh_1294714371_7144P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 01:17:39 GMT, lorddoskias said:

> appropriate treatment in case of emergency. With bigger company this 
> would be harder, though I think the position "account manager" is 
> essential this

Heard someplace, but we've been here ourselves:

"We were thrilled to hear they were assigning us our very own lead account
manager, until we found out the other levels were platinum, gold, silver, and
bronze..."


--==_Exmh_1294714371_7144P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFNK8YDcC3lWbTT17ARAkc1AKCl0/8Fzlf62VkqyNyPFXv5TCKSwwCglpeA
vOh9alvhlCLVV42H/X3hFQw=
=ZRbE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1294714371_7144P--



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post