[134707] in North American Network Operators' Group
Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Kim)
Mon Jan 10 10:31:34 2011
From: Brandon Kim <brandon.kim@brandontek.com>
To: nanog group <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:31:32 -0500
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hello gents:
I wanted to put this out there for all of you. Our network consists of a mi=
xture of Cisco and Extreme equipment.
Would you say that it's fair to say that if you are serious at all about be=
ing a service provider that your core equipment is Cisco based?
Am I limiting myself by thinking that Cisco is the "de facto" vendor of cho=
ice? I'm not looking for so much "fanboy" responses=2C but more of a real w=
orld
experience of what you guys use that actually work and does the job.....
No technical questions here=2C just general feedback. I try to follow the T=
olly Group who compares products=2C and they continually show that Cisco eq=
uipment
is a poor performer in almost any equipment compared to others=2C I find th=
at so hard to believe.....
Thanks!
Brandon
=
