[134749] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Adams)
Mon Jan 10 15:04:33 2011
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:04:28 -0600
From: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>
To: nanog group <nanog@nanog.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>,
nanog group <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikuEdXdoxWMq2s9qOt3=HP=Sk=Xyogta5sqpO0M@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Once upon a time, Andrey Khomyakov <khomyakov.andrey@gmail.com> said:
> There have been awfully too many time when Cisco TAC would just say that
> since the problem you are trying to troubleshoot is between Cisco and
> VendorX, we can't help you. You should have bought Cisco for both sides.
That kind of behavior from a vendor tells me I shouldn't have bought
that vendor for either side.
--
Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
