[134317] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 2010 IPv4 (and IPv6) Address Use Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard Barnes)
Tue Jan 4 12:26:15 2011
In-Reply-To: <C15921C7-B350-4F59-ADF8-3C9F96503D38@muada.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:23:00 -0500
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Certainly not. I was thinking more if people wanted something to pass
on to management, marketing, mother, etc....
--Richard
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum
<iljitsch@muada.com> wrote:
> On 4 jan 2011, at 17:30, Richard Barnes wrote:
>
>> Also, for a slightly more average-person-friendly view, see Iljitsch's
>> article in Ars Technica:
>> <http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/01/2010-in-ip-addresses-22=
5-million-down-496-million-to-go.ars>
>
> I would never dare call NANOG members average. =A0:-)
>
> Iljitsch
