[134106] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Thu Dec 23 21:37:44 2010
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:36:17 -0800
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Scott Taylor <visitorlnx@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin0QJD+67-dcymaH9pBTxOR_oE1W9wS_m9C0uYw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 12/23/10 6:02 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 20:37, Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us> wrote:
>> On 12/21/10 2:18 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
>>> There are 4,035 routes in the global IPv6 routing table. This is what one
>>> provider passed on to me for routes (/48 or larger prefixes), extracted from
>>> public route-view servers.
>>> AT&T AS7018: 2,851 (70.7%)
>>> Cogent AS174: 2,864 (71.0%)
>>> GLBX AS3549: 3,706 (91.8%)
>>> Hurricane Electric AS6939: 3,790 (93.9%)
>>> Qwest AS209: 3,918 (97.1%)
>>> TINET (formerly Tiscali) AS3257: 3,825 (94.8%)
>>> Verizon AS701: 3,938 (97.6%)
>>
>> Sprint (AS1239) is sending 3,779 routes.
>
> I'm seeing the following that haven't been mentioned yet:
> Internet 2 is sending - 4037
> QWest AS209 is sending - 3974
internap 14745 is sending 3985
Nokia backbone 1248 has 3967 in it.
14803's fib has 4007 active external routes in it.
>
