[134103] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth Mattinen)
Thu Dec 23 20:37:37 2010
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:37:28 -0800
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAAAATbSgAABAAAAAEThYncSqKTaelGbK7oMrRAQAAAAA=@iname.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 12/21/10 2:18 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> There are 4,035 routes in the global IPv6 routing table. This is what one
> provider passed on to me for routes (/48 or larger prefixes), extracted from
> public route-view servers.
> AT&T AS7018: 2,851 (70.7%)
> Cogent AS174: 2,864 (71.0%)
> GLBX AS3549: 3,706 (91.8%)
> Hurricane Electric AS6939: 3,790 (93.9%)
> Qwest AS209: 3,918 (97.1%)
> TINET (formerly Tiscali) AS3257: 3,825 (94.8%)
> Verizon AS701: 3,938 (97.6%)
Sprint (AS1239) is sending 3,779 routes.
~Seth
