[134088] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni Fiber Last Mile - a contrary opinion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Thu Dec 23 15:25:46 2010
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:25:37 -0800
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Mail-Followup-To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <26612496.2020.1293125278405.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
There is a large difference between muni-fiber that attempts to
compete for some of the best customers (e.g. the following the
tranditional overbuild method) and muni-fiber who's goal is universal
service of fiber to the home.
Basically it is the difference between a small entity (the town) going
up against a large one (iLEC, CableCo) compared to the small entity
trying to be a supplier to those folks...
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD)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=nb1U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--
