[134030] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Wheeler)
Tue Dec 21 22:09:32 2010
In-Reply-To: <4D114451.9020805@rollernet.us>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:08:43 -0500
From: Jeff Wheeler <jsw@inconcepts.biz>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I could not find this information on any Wikis, but this is the sort
of thing that would be nice to be able to find out without posting on
the list or asking around (obviously.) I have quickly made a couple
of entries with simple enough formatting that anyone can go onto
Wikipedia, click Edit, and add what they know. This is sure to become
a frequently asked question before the answer is always "yes" given
that some major transit-free networks have no functional IPv6
capability of any kind.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_IPv6_support_by_major_transit_pr=
oviders
--=20
Jeff S Wheeler <jsw@inconcepts.biz>
Sr Network Operator=A0 /=A0 Innovative Network Concepts
