[134027] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael K. Smith - Adhost)
Tue Dec 21 20:25:38 2010
From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" <mksmith@adhost.com>
To: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:25:31 +0000
In-Reply-To: <4D114451.9020805@rollernet.us>
Cc: "<nanog@nanog.org>" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Dec 21, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 12/21/2010 14:18, Frank Bulk wrote:
>> There are 4,035 routes in the global IPv6 routing table. This is what o=
ne
>> provider passed on to me for routes (/48 or larger prefixes), extracted =
from
>> public route-view servers.
>> AT&T AS7018: 2,851 (70.7%)
>> Cogent AS174: 2,864 (71.0%)
>> GLBX AS3549: 3,706 (91.8%)
>> Hurricane Electric AS6939: 3,790 (93.9%)
>> Qwest AS209: 3,918 (97.1%)
>> TINET (formerly Tiscali) AS3257: 3,825 (94.8%)
>> Verizon AS701: 3,938 (97.6%)
>>=20
>=20
>=20
> Does this mean Verizon is carrying PI /48s now?
>=20
> ~Seth
>=20
Yes they are.
Mike=
