[134004] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Bulk)
Tue Dec 21 12:33:35 2010
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: frnkblk@iname.com
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com>
To: "'Jared Mauch'" <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <2920734B-D115-42D6-AB87-AD05496A0299@puck.nether.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:33:16 -0600
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: frnkblk@iname.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Thanks. I think the DFP might be a better fit, but right now it's timing
out.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.nether.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 10:39 AM
To: frnkblk@iname.com
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
Maybe this is a good place to start..
http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/compare/
- Jared
On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that had
made
> a comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different operators (i.e. HE,
> Cogent, Sprint, etc), making the point that a full view might take
multiple
> feeds. I think that website also had text files with the comparisons.
>
> But I can't find that e-mail or website anywhere!
>
> Does anyone know where that listserv posting or website is?
>
> Frank
>
>
>
>
