[133534] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attacks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (andrew.wallace)
Sat Dec 11 14:59:25 2010
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:59:07 -0800 (PST)
From: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace@rocketmail.com>
To: Stefan Fouant <sfouant@shortestpathfirst.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace@rocketmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I was reading about this- yeah really "anonymous".=0A=0Ahttp://praetorianpr=
efect.com/archives/2010/12/anonymous-releases-very-unanonymous-press-releas=
e/=0A=0AAlso:=0A=0Ahttp://www.boingboing.net/2010/12/11/anonymous-isnt-loic=
.html=0A=0AAndrew=0A=0A=0A=0A=0AFrom: Stefan Fouant <sfouant@shortestpathfi=
rst.net>=0ATo: 'Marshall Eubanks' <tme@multicasttech.com>; 'North American =
Network Operators Group' <nanog@nanog.org>=0ACc: =0ASent: Saturday, 11 Dece=
mber 2010, 17:34:20=0ASubject: RE: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attack=
s=0A=0AI think the skill level of these guys is clearly evidenced by one of=
the=0Amembers who forgot to remove the metadata from their most recent "pr=
ess=0Arelease". =0A=0AStefan=0A=0A=0A
