[133541] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attacks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (andrew.wallace)
Sat Dec 11 16:42:35 2010
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 13:41:48 -0800 (PST)
From: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace@rocketmail.com>
To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace@rocketmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Like I said the other day on Cnet comments section, December 10, 2010 3:31 =
PM PST.=0A=0A"It is extremely easy to find out who everyone is, because the=
=0A"anonymous" is decentralised and easy to infiltrate and manipulate."=0A=
=0A=0AAndrew=0A=0A=0A=0AFrom: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>=0ATo: North A=
merican Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>=0ACc: =0ASent: Saturday, =
11 December 2010, 21:21:29=0ASubject: Re: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous"=
attacks=0A=0APerhaps the authors of the tool would rather keep the finite =
law=0Aenforcement busy rounding up clueless highschool kids who install=0At=
his tool.=0A=0AIn that sense it's both a network packet DDOS, and a law enf=
orcement=0Aattacker DDOS. Brilliant in a way.=0A=0A=0A=0A
