[133447] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lor=E1nd_Jakab?=)
Thu Dec 9 13:37:31 2010
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:31:43 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lor=E1nd_Jakab?= <ljakab@ac.upc.edu>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <18B3F386-AE8D-4B78-8620-823B66AB44D8@muada.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 12/08/2010 11:08 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 8 dec 2010, at 20:10, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
>
>> Do you think adopting LISP or similar architectures to reduce the problems mentioned above?
[...]
> Do you lose initial packets when there is no mapping state yet?
Yes. But there are proposals to minimize the chances of that occurring,
by pro-actively refreshing mappings in the local cache before their TTL
expires, and warming up the cache with all entries of an upstream
resolver (with a bulk cache transfer) at router boot time.
-Lorand Jakab
