[133446] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [Operational] Internet Police
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Smith)
Thu Dec 9 13:35:14 2010
In-Reply-To: <4D011F14.80002@brightok.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:31:03 -0500
From: Michael Smith <michael@hmsjr.com>
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog. org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
How is "what to block" identified? ...by content key words? ..traffic
profiles / signatures? Deny all, unless flow (addresses/protocol/port) is
pre-approved / registered?
What does the technical solution look like?
Any solutions to maintain some semblance of freedom?
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/9/2010 12:19 PM, Michael Smith wrote:
>
>> So... if/when our
>> employers are unable to resist the US Govt's demand that we "join in the
>> national defense", wouldn't this community be the ones asked to guard the
>> border?
>>
>
> CALEA
>
> done
>
