[133418] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP multihoming question.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gregory Edigarov)
Thu Dec 9 08:11:53 2010
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:11:47 +0200
From: Gregory Edigarov <greg@bestnet.kharkov.ua>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <1291894346.2820.9.camel@valio>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--Sig_/eGC+qaF9L2uwah3aszUUfQM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:32:26 +0200
b2 <b2@playtime.bg> wrote:
> Hi , first sorry for lame question but i'm new to BGP.
> In my ISP I have two full BGP sessions with my two transit providers
> (X and Y), and for every provider i have assigned PA (Provider
> Aggregatable) networks. Is it possible (if there are no filters on
> other side) to advertise X networks to Y and Y to accept them ? My
> confusion comes from the PA status , i know if it is PI there are no
> problem to route it to any AS.=20
Basically I think you need to check with your providers whether they
will accept each other PA's
--=20
With best regards,
Gregory Edigarov
--Sig_/eGC+qaF9L2uwah3aszUUfQM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (OpenBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAk0A1ZMACgkQL3xSW5bRCMVOKQCfSNyTIKDkwo47gh5h9+soI2Fj
NfoAn1Jaa1t4PcDcN1s918rAT9poJN4T
=02yQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/eGC+qaF9L2uwah3aszUUfQM--