[133258] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christian Pena)
Tue Dec 7 17:12:49 2010
In-Reply-To: <20101207201757.GA26837@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
From: Christian Pena <cpena@ststelecom.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:12:53 -0500
To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>,nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I agree, I just joined the list today and was about to unsubscribe because of all the realtively useless posts <ducks behind Leo>
"Leo Bicknell" <bicknell@ufp.org> wrote:
>
>I have a suggestion...
>
>Nanog Mailing List: Critical Operational Content vs. Break time
>Amusement
>
>*ducks*
>
>--
> Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
> PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
