[133256] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jac Kloots)
Tue Dec 7 16:38:21 2010
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:39:27 +0100 (CET)
From: Jac Kloots <Jac.Kloots@SURFnet.nl>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <6DB8A115-6DB5-41BE-BC39-26A54857BA41@delong.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> Ethernet: 40GE vs. 100GE
>>
> ROFL
Even more interesting is the 100GE Optics debate. Standardized (expensive
and very scarce) 100GBASE-LR4 vs non-standard but cheaper and easier to
manufacture LR10 (based on 10x 10Gbit/s on a very narrow DWDM-grid)..
Jac
--
Jac Kloots
Network Services
SURFnet bv
