[132987] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Fri Dec 3 08:04:24 2010
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1012021143080.222@cust11794.lava.net>
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 08:04:41 -0500
To: Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Unless there is robust support for it in home nat/CPE it is dead. Same for t=
hese ipv6 challenges at the edge. I am also not aware of any major networks t=
hat currently have multicast on their backbone also deploying v6mcast. Corre=
ctions to that here or privately welcome.
Sent from my iThing
On Dec 2, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, david raistrick wrote:
>=20
>> If you, the multicast broadcaster, dont have extensive control of the -en=
tire- end to end IP network, it will be significantly broken significant amo=
unts of the time.
>>=20
>>=20
>> ...david (former member of a team of engineers who built and maintained a=
220,000 seat multicast video network)
>=20
> Which points to the need for service providers to deploy robust multicast r=
outing.
>=20
> Antonio Querubin
> 808-545-5282 x3003
> e-mail/xmpp: tony@lava.net
