[132986] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Provo)
Fri Dec 3 07:38:42 2010
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:38:34 -0500
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikMunVqBfEhwydrQsJ7WOwYOnPkZaYsimTYRujh@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:49:53PM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com> wrote:
>
> > fair game for reverse billing. ?If it does, it's going to completely
> > eliminate "transit" as a commercial offering; instead, we'll
> > all be stuck doing settlements in every direction for
> > traffic...and that's just *way* too much paperwork. ?^_^;
>
> oh! that's the LD network.. that worked out so darned well, can we do
> it again? and can we have the ITU manage it for us? please? please?
> please? :)
Obviously, that's what (3) and GLBX want back. Perhps they are feeling
nostalgic.
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
