[132456] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Re: Network management software with high detailed traffic report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ivan Brunello)
Thu Nov 25 12:50:19 2010
From: Ivan Brunello <ivan.brunello@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:49:50 +0100
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Sure it upsets.
We have a bunch of average-populated 6500s,
using the default max age (which was, as far as I remember, 5) made
the switches very slow in responding to SNMP queries.
set them to 10, and, Gotcha! everything works very well.
ivan
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:25:25 +0200
> From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz@forthnet.gr>
> Subject: Re: Network management software with high detailed traffic
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0report
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Message-ID: <4CEBB2B5.5090507@forthnet.gr>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8; format=3Dflowed
>
> There is also CSCsg23226 which might be related.
>
> --
> Tassos
>
>
> Nick Hilliard wrote on 23/11/2010 01:35:
>> On 22/11/2010 22:56, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
>>> Does "service counters max age" help in any way?*
>>> *According to Cisco, setting it too low might upset the snmp counters.*
>>
>>> https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/fundamentals/command/reference/cf_=
r1.html#wp1067159
>>>
>>
>> The "Usage Guidelines" are instructive. :-)
>>
>> Although the update interval defaults to 5 seconds, it still appears
>> to update every 9 seconds on my boxes.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
