[132290] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri Nov 19 12:04:47 2010
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimJ1tByJnfk9E0JT92zJKY80uS+dYSt6SbOhnkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:03:47 -0800
To: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>> I'm sorry to quibble with the majority here, but, in this case, I think
>> we have enough problems with ambiguous terminology in
>> networking and this opportunity to avoid creating one more should
>> not be missed.
>
(The above paragraph was mainly so that I had an opportunity to toss
quibble into the text with it's other meaning).
> Agreed. OTOH, Hextet is not technically correct while appearing to be so.
>
True... The correct term would be decohextet, but, decohextet is rather
long both to say and to write and really doesn't roll off the tongue the
way hextet does.
Owen
