[132442] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Janet Sullivan)
Tue Nov 23 11:45:45 2010
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimhn5vyLMBTCzUmh27P2pAAd8Rdo9ogJkb1scX6@mail.gmail.com>
From: Janet Sullivan <netgeek@bgp4.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:45:38 -0800
To: "trejrco@gmail.com" <trejrco@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Nov 22, 2010, at 5:05 PM, TJ <trejrco@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 08:14, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
>
>> If 8 bits is a byte, then 16 bits should be a mouthful.
>>
>> Scott
>>
> If we can't choose mouthful (which for some reason sounds thematically
> correct), "chunk" gets my vote.
> *(Chunk = Maybe not the most technical, but has been working for me all
> along ...)*
>
> /TJ
I think each section should be a nom, and :: can be a om. My lolcat agrees.
