|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:08:51 -0700 From: todd glassey <tglassey@earthlink.net> To: nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikXOt1btsz4JehjHP+oRCHbybttwO+mGq_=6Zke@mail.gmail.com> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On 10/22/2010 8:04 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:46 AM, George Bonser <gbonser@seven.com> wrote: >> An agreement signed this month with the Department of Homeland Security >> and an earlier initiative to protect companies in the defense industrial >> base make it likely that the military will be a key part of any response >> to a cyber attack. > > are any of the civilian agencies really prepared/capable of dealing > with 'cyber attack'? Yes... it seems fairly natural that a 'cyber attack' (on > the gov't, or it's pieces/parts) is equivalent to an 'attack' on same. true... > We don't arm the NIST folks with Ar-15's and send them over the hill, > we do that with marines. So you clearly have never been on a DDCC S&D Raid I can tell. Todd > > -chris > > -- //----------------------------------------------------------------- This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |