[131373] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Fri Oct 22 14:04:00 2010
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:03:26 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
In-Reply-To: <19649.51640.224298.319039@world.std.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:28:24PM -0400, Barry Shein wrote:
>
> It occurs to me that there is some pressing need to investigate this
> all-IPv6 internet -- motivated by the cost of (not) maintaining IPv4
> forever.
>
> Right now we can observe essentially an all-IPv4 internet (99%,
> whatever.)
>
> --
> -Barry Shein
For this, you need to leave the comfort of NANOG and look
at the CERNnet network over the past ten years. They have
been running a large, all IPv6 network for some time now.
http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/Cannes-19148-IPv6-development-China-Outline-Efforts-CERNET-History-Testbed-1-2-3-4-5-Next-Generation-Inter-in-as-Entertainment-ppt-powerpoint/
www.cs.princeton.edu/~yiwang/papers/iscc05.pdf
http://www.cernet2.edu.cn/en/char.htm
--bill
