[131209] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Failover IPv6 with =?utf-8?Q?multiple_?=

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phil Regnauld)
Thu Oct 21 13:03:08 2010

Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:02:59 +0200
From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@nsrc.org>
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
In-Reply-To: <4CC070E9.7090709@unfix.org>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Jeroen Massar (jeroen) writes:
> 
> Now the problem with such a setup is the many locations where you
> actually are hardcoding the IP addresses/prefixes into: firewalls, DNS
> etc. That is the hard part to solve, especially when these services are
> managed by other parties.

	And probably the reason why most won't deploy RA and multiple prefixes.
	Hardcode and NAT, baby!


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post