[130165] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What must one do to avoid Gmail's retarded non-spam filtering?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen van Aart)
Wed Sep 29 14:12:14 2010
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:11:43 -0700
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net>
To: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <14393847.0.1285715774095.JavaMail.root@zimbra.caneris.com>
X-Assp-Envelope-From: jeroen@mompl.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Erik L wrote:
> Received-SPF: pass ...
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass ...
>
> So the problem is unlikely to be a SPF issue, as mentioned in my first e-mail.
http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html
The lack of SPF records should never be the reason to block an email.
It's about time SPF is being laid to rest, it's broken, ineffective and
a flawed concept. Well, it's effective in legitimising spammers and
breaking forwarding for example, but otherwise...
--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html
