[129742] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen van Aart)
Fri Sep 17 16:10:28 2010
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:10:11 -0700
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <5A6D953473350C4B9995546AFE9939EE0A52AD76@RWC-EX1.corp.seven.com>
X-Assp-Envelope-From: jeroen@mompl.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
George Bonser wrote:
> I believe a network should be able to sell priotitization at the edge,
> but not in the core. I have no problem with Y!, for example, paying a
> network to be prioritized ahead of bit torrent on the segment to the end
Considering yahoo (as any other big freemailer) is (unwillingly for the
most part) facilitating a lot of spam traffic this would mean a lot of
spam traffic gets prioritised. I can see that as an undesirable and
unfortunate side effect.
Regards,
Jeroen
--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html
