[129704] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian Johnson)
Thu Sep 16 15:38:24 2010
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:38:12 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1089A30C-661E-47F6-BF51-90937524374F@delong.com>
From: "Brian Johnson" <bjohnson@drtel.com>
To: "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen@delong.com]
>Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:17 PM
>To: George Bonser
>Cc: NANOG list
>Subject: Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid,Prioritized
Traffic?
>
<SNIP>
>
>The point is that if the provider is deciding based on some third party
>paying them and thus my neighbors are getting more bandwidth
>than I am, not because they're paying more, but, because they're
>choosing to use the services that bribed my provider, then that's
>not a good thing.
This actually is a case for net neutrality. I worry about things like
ACLS to prevent SPAM or abuse/security will get tarred with the same
feathers.
- Brian
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, =
is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged =
information. Any unauthorized review,
copying, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not =
the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the =
original message. Thank you.
