[129598] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid,

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Provo)
Mon Sep 13 09:50:36 2010

Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:50:21 -0400
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <b7dda52f206b0e1f888802471a4173b0@10.0.0.5>
Reply-To: nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 01:40:10PM +0000, Julien Gormotte wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:28:09 -0400, Rodrick Brown
> <rodrick.brown@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Its unrealistic to believe payment for priority access isn't going to
> > happen this model is used for many other outlets today I'm not sure why
> so
> > many are against it when it comes to net access. 
> 
> Because of net neutrality ?

Much like Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy, that's one of the many 
"re-assurance" myths that one eventually abandons in the course
of maturing.  

[cue endless thread of knee-jerk responses; can we just Godwin it
now please?]


-- 
             RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post