[129011] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: PacketShader
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Smith)
Mon Aug 23 08:04:16 2010
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:30:06 +0930
From: Mark Smith <nanog@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <104783.1282557583@localhost>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 05:59:43 -0400
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 22:23:19 -1000, Michael Painter said:
> > Researchers in South Korea have built a networking router that transmits data
> > at record speeds from components found in most high-end desktop computers
> > http://www.technologyreview.com/communications/26096/?nlid=3423
>
> Two great quotes from the article:
>
> "That isn't fast enough to take advantage of the full speed of a typical
> network card, which operates at 10 gigabytes per second."
>
> Anybody got a network of PCs that have cards that run at 10GBytes/sec? ;)
>
I missed that, and that answers the "was it a GigaBytes verses Gigabits
error" question. Nothing new here by the looks of it - people in this
thread were getting those sorts of speeds a year ago out of PC hardware
under Linux -
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/15/234
"I have achieved a collective throughput of 66.25 Gbit/s."
"We've achieved 70 Gbps aggregate unidirectional TCP performance from
one P6T6 based system to another."
