[129043] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: PacketShader
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Mon Aug 23 18:25:14 2010
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:25:05 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100823185630.072D81CC3B@ptavv.es.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Really, in this day and age, a chassis throughput of 100G is pretty
> trivial. When you start getting up to the Tbps range on a system using
> "standard components", then I'll be really interested.
i suspect that a rule of thumb is that leading edge home appliances are
one decimal digit behind leading edge routers and cost two decimal
digits less. so it's a trade-off. which is why we get the big bucks.
randy
