[128730] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Lightly used IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Sun Aug 15 07:28:37 2010
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:28:25 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
In-Reply-To: <59CA4D8B-93EC-433F-BBE0-1743BC2E2830@arin.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>>>> gosh, i must have completely misread section nine
>>> Seeking contractual rights contrary to IETF RFCs 2008 and 2150?
>> oh, and if you feel that you have those rights by other means than the
>> lrsa, then why is section nine in the lrsa. just remove it.
> Easy to do, you can either:
> 1) Change the appropriate policy language (NRPM 6.4.1) via the ARIN policy
> development process, in which case the LRSA will be updated as noted, or
> 2) If you feel that you'd prefer a different forum, you can address this on a
> more global basis (since each RIR has similar language regarding addresses)
> by going through the IETF and revising the RFCs, which will likely result
> in the RIRs all reviewing their documents accordingly.
oh. was section nine of the lrsa done by the policy process?
please stop using the community consensus meme to cover for what you,
your lawyer, and your board came up with in a back room.
> p.s. If you want to continue to discuss, can we shortly move this to
> PPML
no thanks.
randy
