[128729] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Lightly used IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Sun Aug 15 06:49:41 2010
From: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 06:49:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m2pqxkkwg1.wl%randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Aug 15, 2010, at 6:21 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>=20
>>> gosh, i must have completely misread section nine
>> Seeking contractual rights contrary to IETF RFCs 2008 and 2150?
>=20
> oh, and if you feel that you have those rights by other means than the
> lrsa, then why is section nine in the lrsa. just remove it.=20
Easy to do, you can either:=20
1) Change the appropriate policy language (NRPM 6.4.1) via the ARIN policy=
=20
development process, in which case the LRSA will be updated as noted, or=
=20
2) If you feel that you'd prefer a different forum, you can address this on=
a =20
more global basis (since each RIR has similar language regarding address=
es)=20
by going through the IETF and revising the RFCs, which will likely resul=
t=20
in the RIRs all reviewing their documents accordingly.
Either route requires that the community comes to a consensus on the change=
=20
and can give you the results you seek. Or you can enjoy the status quo.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
p.s. If you want to continue to discuss, can we shortly move this to PPML=20
or ARIN-Discuss for the sake of those not interested in these matters
who have different expectations from their NANOG list subscription?
