[128700] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Lightly used IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Sat Aug 14 13:29:31 2010
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <9A0C0575-2B8F-4CF3-8691-BD34669DC383@delong.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:30:04 -0700
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Aug 14, 2010, at 8:05, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>=20
> The lack of end-site multihoming (more specifically the lack of PI for
> end-sites) was created by the IETF and resolved by the RIRs.
> The beginning of resolving this was ARIN proposal 2002-3.
>=20
> The RA religion still hasn't been solved.
Neither for that matter has the dhcp religion. Autoconfiguration and =
bootstrapping were not solved problems for ipv4 inn 1994 and in some =
respects still aren't. The mind boggles that we consider the ipv4 =
situation so much better than the v6 case...
> Owen
>=20
>=20
>=20
