[128613] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Lightly used IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Eisenberg)
Fri Aug 13 14:49:49 2010
From: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan@atlasnetworks.us>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:49:35 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20100813183143.GV2582@sizone.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Is this upstream going to cut that customer off and
> lose the revenue, just to satisfy ARIN's bleating?=20
Isn't this a little bit like an SSL daemon? One which refuses to process a=
revocation list on the basis of the function of the certificate is useless=
. The revocation list only has authority if the agent asks for and process=
es it. Would you use this SSL daemon, knowing that it had this bug?
I would consider a transit provider who subverted an ARIN revocation to be =
disreputable, and seek other sources of transit.
Best Regards,
Nathan Eisenberg
Atlas Networks, LLC
