[128384] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Aug 5 09:38:15 2010
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:23:12 EDT."
<AANLkTimXuvjMLEWf1RBxGr510vFCvW0ZgxiKUL7y1=rn@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:37:28 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1281015448_3971P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:23:12 EDT, William Herrin said:
> What personal gain standard? I certainly didn't advocate one, and I
> don't find anything like that in ARIN's rules.
What you said:
> Absent such a change, redacting identity and contact info for the apartment
> management company remains simple fraud.
"fraud" is usually defined as "deception with intent for personal gain". *That*
standard. My point is that redation does not *in and of itself* rise to the level of fraud.
--==_Exmh_1281015448_3971P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFMWr6YcC3lWbTT17ARAinDAJ9kpxZ0a2Yby6Gg2UjlnNPTXuu6bACeJ+Uc
oHdqG+NRIiDOgdm3QT9vgWo=
=wPbT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1281015448_3971P--
