[128383] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Thu Aug 5 09:23:41 2010
In-Reply-To: <62914.1281014237@localhost>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 09:23:12 -0400
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:17 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 08:58:48 EDT, William Herrin said:
>
>> It takes some creative reading to think I claimed using an alternate
>> but still correct address (e.g. supplied by mailboxes etc.)
>> constituted fraud. Alternate !=3D redacted.
>
> Right. =A0The point is that by the same "what is the personal gain" stand=
ard, it
> isn't obvious that redacted =3D=3D fraud by definition.
What personal gain standard? I certainly didn't advocate one, and I
don't find anything like that in ARIN's rules. As far as I can tell,
anyone can pick an alternate postal address, a hotmail email address
and a vonage phone number for their SWIP information if they so
choose, quite regardless of whether any personal gain is involved.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--=20
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com=A0 bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
