[127301] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Todd Underwood was a little late

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Dillon)
Mon Jun 21 13:17:48 2010

In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim0D9hvdEMOu2HOPpHOq_0ecCZ6X6oF1FGdJF96@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:17:33 +0100
From: Michael Dillon <wavetossed@googlemail.com>
To: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, Todd Underwood <toddunder@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

> P.S. At this point, the IPv6 transition has failed, unlike the Y2K
> transition, and
> some level of crisis is unavoidable. In desperate times, people take desparate
> measures, and "adopting" IP address ranges that are not used by others in
> your locality seems a reasonable thing to do when economic survival is at
> stake.
>
> P.P.S. I saw a report that someone, somewhere, had analysed some data
> which indicates that IP address allocation rates are increasing and there is
> a real possibility that we will runout by the end of this year, 2010.
> Does anyone
> know where I can find the actual analysis that led to this report?

This is where the claim of runout in December 2010 comes from.
<http://news.techworld.com/networking/3227420/last-ipv4-addresses-could-run-out-by-december/>

--Michael Dillon


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post