[127304] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Todd Underwood was a little late
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Jun 21 15:54:39 2010
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinxY7h3GAOvxM3t1Sw8CuD6Pez-BmDxqjDOx63t@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:54:26 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Michael Dillon <wavetossed@googlemail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Michael Dillon
<wavetossed@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> I don't think we'll have (nor would we have in 2005 even) gotten an
>> ipv7/8/9/10 up and spec'd/coded/wrung-out before ~2 yrs from now
>> either. So, given the cards we have, ipv6 isn't all bad.
>
> On this we agree.
> The problem is not IPv6, it is the failure to deploy IPv6 soon enough.
> Not enough trained people, not enough testing, not enough bugs shaken
> out.
ok, that matches pretty much exactly what I see/think. Perhaps the
initial wording was just odd :)
thanks!
-chris
