[127269] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Internet Kill Switch.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Jones)
Fri Jun 18 16:05:39 2010
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:05:18 -0400
From: James Jones <james@freedomnet.co.nz>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4C429056.8000703@cox.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
look like like they are trying to squeeze both ends.
http://www.crn.com/networking/225700593;jsessionid=IR3YB1SGLW2BHQE1GHPSKH4ATMY32JVN
On 18/07/10 1:25 AM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> On 6/18/2010 00:16, Tom Wright wrote:
>
>> What ever happened to this?
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3271.txt
>>
> Every thing in that RFC from enabling freedom of speech to high volumes
> of untaxed dollars is anathema to the current administration.
>
> And yeah, that is politics and not BGP fine tuning.
>
> But if we don't take an interest in what they are doing, BGP isn't going
> to matter much.
>
> So, yes, this is a call to look at the layer 10 stuff a bit.
>
> If it isn't already too late.
>
> I've said my piece, moderators. Stand down.
>
>
