[126801] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: racktables
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Don McMorris)
Tue Jun 1 15:27:05 2010
In-Reply-To: <8BF1A686A4943A4BB60A42B82FFFD31C01271D@EXCHANGE01.VAS.COYHILE.COM>
From: Don McMorris <don.mcmorris@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:26:08 -0400
To: Coy Hile <Coy.Hile@coyhile.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In my two most prominent deployments, I have 0.16.4 and 0.17.9. I
don't believe we have any deployments (either direct or accessed by
us) that are above 0.17.9.
--Don
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Coy Hile <Coy.Hile@coyhile.com> wrote:
>
> I've seen racktables mentioned recently in an IP Address management threa=
d. =A0Do people use the stable version (0.17) or the beta (0.18<mumble>)?
>
>
