[126800] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP Address Management Tool
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Peter Wohlers)
Tue Jun 1 14:46:05 2010
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:45:31 -0700
From: Peter Wohlers <pedro@whack.org>
To: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
In-Reply-To: <4C05458E.1050200@rollernet.us>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 6/1/10 9:22 AM, Justin Wilson wrote:
>
>> He has since reversed that stance and they are working on IPV6 support,
>> at least that is what I read somewhere. I don¹t blame the guy really. If
>> people want a feature they should pony up a little money. Otherwise it is
>> free software with no implied support.
>>
>
>
> I feel that IPv6 should be a minimum requirement. At the time the author
> felt it should be an advanced paid-for feature. I treat commercial
> vendors the same way: no IPv6, no sale. That nastygram made me not want
> to donate (money or code) to IPplan. One shouldn't get into open source
> expecting money.
>
> The world moves forward and what is seen as a minimum requirement is
> eventually going to move with it.
>
> ~Seth
>
>
didn't we just have this whole discussion three months ago?
that being said, IPv6 exists in the beta versions that are currently
available.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/iptrack/files/
--Peter
