[126607] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Quick IP6/BGP question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael K. Smith - Adhost)
Mon May 24 14:28:31 2010
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:26:32 -0700
In-Reply-To: <FA2E47FFA50291418803D2E7C1DF07F30B4ED3F8@SDEXCL01.Proflowers.com>
From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" <mksmith@adhost.com>
To: "Thomas Magill" <tmagill@providecommerce.com>,
<nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Magill [mailto:tmagill@providecommerce.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 11:22 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Quick IP6/BGP question
>=20
> >From the provider side, are most of you who are implementing IP6
> peerings running BGP over IP4 and just using IP6 address families to
> exchange routes or doing IP6 peering?
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Thomas Magill
> Network Engineer
>=20
> Office: (858) 909-3777
>=20
> Cell: (858) 869-9685
> mailto:tmagill@providecommerce.com
<mailto:tmagill@providecommerce.com>
>=20
At the Seattle Internet Exchange we have both IPv4 and IPv6 peering, via
discrete addresses, on the same interface.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksmith@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
