[126606] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Quick IP6/BGP question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Oberman)
Mon May 24 14:26:20 2010
To: "Thomas Magill" <tmagill@providecommerce.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 24 May 2010 11:21:45 PDT."
<FA2E47FFA50291418803D2E7C1DF07F30B4ED3F8@SDEXCL01.Proflowers.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:26:10 -0700
From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:21:45 -0700
> From: "Thomas Magill" <tmagill@providecommerce.com>
>
> >From the provider side, are most of you who are implementing IP6
> peerings running BGP over IP4 and just using IP6 address families to
> exchange routes or doing IP6 peering?
Can't speak for "most of us", but we run an iBGP v4 mesh carrying both
v4 and v6 routes.
For external peers, we run separate peerings.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
