[126479] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper SRX-210 -- CCC certificate required
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lala Lander)
Tue May 18 05:14:26 2010
In-Reply-To: <20100518085248.GJ40235@ronin.4ever.de>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 02:14:11 -0700
From: Lala Lander <sshafi@gmail.com>
To: elmi@ronin.4ever.de, gordon b slater <gordslater@ieee.org>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
You should buy locally in China and Juniper's partner in china will provide
you CCC.
thanks,
Shahid
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Elmar K. Bins <elmi@4ever.de> wrote:
> Re Gordon,
>
> gordslater@ieee.org (gordon b slater) wrote:
>
> > ...something in the back of my head says they retracted from their
> > initial stance recently (few month ago?) and said the CCC for IT
> > security kit was only needed for Gov't Procurement kit - I could be very
> > wrong, it was a snippet of casual conversation in passing.
>
> Thank you for this side note already - I'll forward your thoughts,
> maybe it helps. Still, if anyone can dig something up...
>
>
> > Maybe you're just up against extra red tape, officials not up to speed
> > etc; or maybe it is for a Govt Contract after all.
>
> It's not for a government contract (it's for the renewal of the
> ".de" ccTLD DNS setup in Beijing), and they could have put the
> red tape around other stuff that's in there. I guess it's just
> the usual formalism.
>
> Unfortunately, Google doesn't come up with anything about SRX's
> and CCC certification, though there seems to be a version with
> chinese plugsets...
>
> Yours,
> Elmar.
>
> --
>
> "Machen Sie sich erst einmal unbeliebt. Dann werden Sie auch
> ernstgenommen."
> (Konrad
> Adenauer)
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE
> ]---
>
>
>
