[126478] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper SRX-210 -- CCC certificate required
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Elmar K. Bins)
Tue May 18 05:09:29 2010
Resent-From: elmi@ronin.4ever.de
Resent-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 10:52:48 +0200
From: Elmar K. Bins <elmi@4ever.de>
To: gordon b slater <gordslater@ieee.org>
Mail-Followup-To: elmi@ronin.4ever.de,
gordon b slater <gordslater@ieee.org>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <1274172430.23402.6.camel@ub-g-d2>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Re Gordon,
gordslater@ieee.org (gordon b slater) wrote:
> ...something in the back of my head says they retracted from their
> initial stance recently (few month ago?) and said the CCC for IT
> security kit was only needed for Gov't Procurement kit - I could be very
> wrong, it was a snippet of casual conversation in passing.
Thank you for this side note already - I'll forward your thoughts,
maybe it helps. Still, if anyone can dig something up...
> Maybe you're just up against extra red tape, officials not up to speed
> etc; or maybe it is for a Govt Contract after all.
It's not for a government contract (it's for the renewal of the
".de" ccTLD DNS setup in Beijing), and they could have put the
red tape around other stuff that's in there. I guess it's just
the usual formalism.
Unfortunately, Google doesn't come up with anything about SRX's
and CCC certification, though there seems to be a version with
chinese plugsets...
Yours,
Elmar.
--
"Machen Sie sich erst einmal unbeliebt. Dann werden Sie auch ernstgenommen."
(Konrad Adenauer)
--------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---
