[126402] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Fri May 14 14:49:26 2010
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinzBMjtmbp90q6Thm5Lsu_d9NA4w6vm18Pq_we3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 14:49:11 -0400
To: Jack Carrozzo <jack@crepinc.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I'm curious what providers have not gotten their IPv6 =
plans/networks/customer ports enabled.
I know that Comcast is doing their trials now (Thanks John!) and will be =
presenting at the upcoming NANOG about their experiences.
What parts of the big "I" Internet are not enabled or ready?
- Jared
On May 14, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
> I agree - if you can get native v6 transit then more power to you. But
> tunnels are sure better than no IPv6 connectivity in my mind. Aside =
from
> slight performance/efficiency issues, I've never had an issue.
>=20
> -Jack Carrozzo
