[126456] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Ulitskiy)
Mon May 17 10:50:59 2010
From: Michael Ulitskiy <mulitskiy@acedsl.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:50:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: <201005142325.10617.mulitskiy@acedsl.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hello,
Just wanted to say thanks to everybody who replied and/or offered help.
I've got a few private peering offers, so I guess I'm ok now.
Thanks a lot,
Michael
On Friday 14 May 2010 11:25:10 pm Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I've started this thread looking for advice on available options.
> There's no doubt in my mind that native connectivity is better than tunnels,
> but unfortunately tunnel is the only way to get me started, 'cause my upstream
> does not support ipv6 (hopefully just yet) and I have no budget for additional
> circuits to ipv6-enabled carrier.
> So my question still stands: is anyone aware of a reasonable tunneled ipv6
> transit service (I mean aside from HE tunnel broker)? The load will be really
> light. I don't expect we'll break a few Mbit/s in the nearest future and when
> we do then I guess it'll be the time to look for the native transit.
> Thanks,
>
> Michael
>
> On Thursday 13 May 2010 18:18:12 Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We're in the early stage of planning ipv6 deployment -
> > learning/labbing/experimenting/etc. We've got to the point when we're also
> > planning to request initial ipv6 allocation from ARIN. So I wonder what
> > ipv6 transit options I have if my upstreams do not support native ipv6
> > connectivity? I see Hurricane Electric tunnel broker BGP tunnel. Is there
> > anything else? Either free or commercial? Thanks,
> >
> > Michael
> >
>
>
