[126386] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Thu May 13 21:39:43 2010
In-Reply-To: <201005131818.12316.mulitskiy@acedsl.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 21:39:28 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Michael Ulitskiy <mulitskiy@acedsl.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Michael Ulitskiy <mulitskiy@acedsl.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're in the early stage of planning ipv6 deployment - learning/labbing/experimenting/etc.
> We've got to the point when we're also planning to request initial ipv6 allocation from ARIN.
> So I wonder what ipv6 transit options I have if my upstreams do not support native ipv6 connectivity?
> I see Hurricane Electric tunnel broker BGP tunnel. Is there anything else? Either free or commercial?
1) see gblx/ntt/sprint/twt/vzb for transit-v6
2) tunnel inside your domain (your control, your MTU issues, your
alternate pathing of tunnels vs pipe)
3) don't tunnel beyond your borders, really just don't
tunnels are bad, always.
-chris
> Thanks,
>
> Michael
>
>
